Driver Testing at the PGA Championship
During practice days at the PGA Championship, approximately one-third of the players opted to have their drivers tested to confirm that the springlike effect of the clubfaces complied with regulations. Although these tests, known as “CT” or “pendulum tests,” have been a routine practice for years and usually do not attract much attention, the recent testing at Quail Hollow made significant headlines.
The Importance of CT Testing
The “CT” test evaluates how much a driver’s face flexes upon impact. Over time, a driver can wear down, and if it becomes too thin, it may violate the rules by acting overly springy. Notably, Rory McIlroy’s driver failed its pre-tournament test at the PGA, and although these results are typically confidential, reports about McIlroy leaked to the media. Furthermore, Scottie Scheffler’s driver also did not pass the test, but he subsequently replaced it and went on to win the tournament.
Ongoing Driver Testing Conversations
In the aftermath, discussions around driver testing continue. At the recent LIV Golf event in Virginia, Bryson DeChambeau expressed his support for the current testing protocols. He indicated that he has been tested regularly and appreciates the structure, asserting that it ensures all players, regardless of their equipment, are held to the same standards.
Frequency of Driver Replacement
DeChambeau, known for his meticulous approach to equipment, revealed that he typically goes through about two drivers a month but aims to keep a preferred head as long as possible. In contrast, fellow golfer Patrick Reed tends to replace his driver less frequently, stating that he doesn’t swing hard enough to wear them out quickly.
Fairness and Testing Concerns
Reed acknowledges the need for testing, but he also feels it introduces an element of uncertainty during major tournaments. He voiced that worrying about whether a driver is within the acceptable limits detracts from preparation. Others, like Lucas Glover, suggested that players might test backup drivers instead of their primary ones to avoid complications, a sentiment echoed by Matt Jones.
Calls for Comprehensive Testing
Some LIV players expressed surprise that only a subset of players undergo testing instead of the entire field. Reed and Richard Bland questioned this approach, highlighting concerns about fairness when some players are tested frequently while others might not be tested at all. However, Marc Leishman raised logistical concerns over whether full-field testing is feasible.
Support for Regular Testing
Many players, including Reed and Bland, have advocated for regular driver testing at LIV events to ensure all clubs conform to established regulations. They believe maintaining integrity on the tour is essential. Sergio Garcia supports the idea, emphasizing that testing is crucial for ensuring all clubs adhere to the rules, as wear and tear can push equipment to the limits.