The iPhone Air is set to launch this Friday, and some early reviewers have already gotten their hands on Apple’s slimmest iPhone to date. This model marks the brand’s most significant design change since the iPhone X, which introduced FaceID and OLED displays. However, instead of focusing on new sensors or display technology, Apple is emphasizing how the iPhone feels in use. Initial reactions suggest that users are quite impressed.
Nevertheless, it has some shortcomings, particularly regarding the camera quality and battery life. Similar to the ongoing discussion between MacBook Air and MacBook Pro, users are questioning whether the performance tradeoffs are worth the sleek design and lighter weight. For many reviewers, the answer leans toward yes, especially for those who prioritize aesthetics, portability, and a touch of uniqueness in their everyday device.
Mashable is currently preparing its full review of the iPhone Air. Until then, here’s a summary of the early impressions from various reviewers.
Design Insights
WIRED’s Julian Chokkata commented:
The iPhone Air is impressively thin at just 5.6 mm and weighs 165 grams, whereas the iPhone 17 Pro, with a smaller screen, weighs 206 grams and is 8.75 mm thick. Initially, the Air’s lighter feel may seem “cheap,” but that impression disappears quickly, revealing a strong and durable device.
CNET’s Abrar Al-Heeti noted:
One disappointing design feature is the absence of a bottom speaker, with audio only coming from the top. This affects the overall listening experience, particularly for those who enjoy streaming videos on their device. While it’s not a major flaw, for a phone priced around $1,000, better audio options would be expected without needing external headphones.
Battery Performance
The Verge’s Allison Johnson stated:
The battery life is average. For light users, especially those mainly on Wi-Fi, this shouldn’t pose a significant problem.
PCMag’s Eric Zeman added:
The iPhone Air managed 19 hours and 15 minutes of usage, less than the 21 hours and 51 minutes of the iPhone 16 Plus but better than the 17 hours and 47 minutes of the iPhone 16. Nonetheless, it has the shortest battery life among the new iPhone 17 models, falling behind the iPhone 17 and 17 Pro, which offer substantial improvements.
Camera Features
TechRadar’s Jacob Krol remarked:
The compromises of the thin design are evident in the camera capabilities—a single 48-megapixel Fusion camera that offers limited zoom options and quality degradation beyond 2x magnification.
The Verge’s Allison Johnson added:
Despite having a 48-megapixel rear camera and an 18-megapixel selfie camera, the single rear sensor feels inadequate for a premium device, especially when competitors offer more versatile camera options.
Tom’s Guide’s Mark Spoonauer concluded:
It’s unfortunate that users miss out on both ultrawide and telephoto capabilities with the iPhone Air, which allows for great versatility in photography, unlike rivals like Samsung. Nonetheless, the main camera performs well overall.
