Debate Over Sarfaraz Khan’s Exclusion from Indian Cricket
The absence of the exceptionally talented cricketer Sarfaraz Khan from the India A team has sparked a flurry of discussions and outrage on social media, with many alleging bias behind his non-selection. Despite being only 29 years old and having made a mark with two fifties and a score of 150 in just six Test matches, the fact that he is not included in the Indian senior squad or even India A raises eyebrows. He made his debut against England last year, an unexpected entry in an era where fitness is highly prioritized.
His robust physique hasn’t hindered his performance; in fact, he showcased remarkable batting skills in the Ranji Trophy, boasting an astounding average of 82.83 in first-class cricket at one point, trailing only legends Donald Bradman and Vijay Merchant. With over a decade of competing at the highest level, his current first-class average stands impressively at 65.
Strangely, it took him nearly a decade to earn his place on the national team. During his debut, he captivated audiences with his bold strokes, earning comparisons to greats like Javed Miandad. Following this promising start, he delivered another stunning performance with a crafted 150 against New Zealand, indicating a bright future. However, after just two more Tests in which his scores dwindled, he found himself sidelined.
Despite significant contributions in his first Test, a reshuffle in the batting order created doubts about his performance under pressure, leading to his exclusion from the playing XI and subsequent tours. He briefly played for India A against the England Lions but has since faced seeming disregard from selectors, leaving him sidelined.
Critics find it difficult to contest the notion of unfairness in his treatment. At a height of 5 feet, 5 inches, his stocky build often invites criticism regarding fitness for international cricket. However, after a year away from the Indian team, he has shed 11 kg, showing he is determined to reclaim his place, even as selectors overlook him.
Questions about potential biases have emerged, with some politicians and social media users suggesting that his last name, “Khan,” may influence his exclusion. While there’s consensus on the unfair treatment he has received, dragging his religion into the issue is seen by many as distasteful. Historically, Muslim representation in Indian cricket has not been contentious, despite isolated instances of unfair treatment.
Today, Sarfaraz may be subjected to unpredictable selection policies that obscure true talent. The case of Karun Nair, who despite outstanding performances remains overlooked, illustrates this blatant injustice. In a time when promoting division is rampant, the cricket governing body is urged to clarify their reasoning behind such exclusions. It would be unfortunate if a player’s career was caught in the crossfire of suspicion, bias, and political rivalries.
— The writer is the author of ‘Not Quite Cricket’ and ‘Not Just Cricket’
