Angels’ Late Game Decision Raises Eyebrows Among Players

ANAHEIM, Calif. — Many players from the Los Angeles Angels would have preferred a late afternoon flight after their Thursday game against the Pittsburgh Pirates, allowing them to land in Minnesota at a decent hour. This would have been ideal for dinner, a good night’s rest, and ample preparation for Friday’s game against the Twins.

Had the Angels opted for the typical early afternoon getaway game, as most teams do, that scenario could have materialized. Instead, they scheduled the Thursday match for 6:29 p.m., just nine minutes before their usual 6:38 p.m. start time, the maximum permitted under the league’s collective bargaining agreement. Consequently, the team will face a quick turnaround with minimal sleep before their next game.

“It’s not ideal for sure,” commented Angels star Mike Trout. “I’m not sure when we’re set to land, but it will be early. We’ve got a night game to play afterward, and the next day’s schedule calls for a day game.”

This scheduling choice has not gone unnoticed; players and staff view it as an unnecessary strain that could diminish their chances of winning. “I don’t think it’s healthy for anyone,” remarked Angels closer and four-time All-Star Kenley Jansen, highlighting the challenges posed by late travel and early game times.

While this is not an issue plaguing the entire league, the Angels have gained a reputation for frequently scheduling late getaway days, often in scenarios that challenge player endurance. In 2019, for instance, they played the majority of their weekday getaway games at night, an approach that has persisted despite some shifts towards earlier start times in subsequent seasons.

“I don’t think it should be allowed, to be honest,” added outfielder Taylor Ward. “There should certainly be regulations to prevent these situations, as they seem pretty unreasonable.”

Despite the criticism, the Angels’ scheduling is technically permissible. The collective bargaining agreement outlines travel times, resulting in the decision for a 6:29 p.m. start based on calculated flight durations. Team management, while emphasizing fan convenience, did not address specific inquiries about the game time, and whether financial motivations played a role remains uncertain. With the potential for increased attendance at later games, the team’s choice may have financial roots.