MELBOURNE, Australia — Iga Świątek raised concerns about privacy at the Australian Open, questioning whether players are treated like athletes or “animals in the zoo.” This commentary followed intensifying criticism regarding the tournament’s lack of private spaces.
The night before, Coco Gauff was filmed smashing her racket multiple times in what she believed was a private area after her quarterfinal loss to Elina Svitolina. In a press conference, Gauff expressed frustration, stating, “the only private place we have is the locker room,” and that certain moments shouldn’t be broadcasted.
With cameras everywhere—from the parking lot to the gym—players have little room for privacy, especially compared to other tournaments like Wimbledon. Notably, Świątek herself was filmed being denied access to a player area for lacking proper accreditation, echoing a similar experience of Roger Federer seven years ago. Recently, she was also captured lying down with her eyes shut before her match against Elena Rybakina.
Following her defeat by Rybakina, Świątek supported Gauff’s viewpoint, questioning, “Are we tennis players, or are we, like, animals in the zoo?” She continued, emphasizing the need for privacy and a personal space away from constant observation, indicating that at events like Wimbledon and Roland Garros, a balance is struck with designated private areas.
Świątek referenced the tranquil surroundings at Wimbledon and Roland Garros, pointing out that those locations offer courts accessible only to accredited individuals, providing a break from fan presence. She argued, “We’re meant to be watched on the court, and in the press… but we shouldn’t be the subject of ridicule, like memes, for forgetting our accreditations.”
A spokesperson for Tennis Australia responded that balancing player comfort with fan engagement is a priority. They highlighted ongoing efforts to create more private areas for players, including quiet rooms and strategy spaces, while maintaining behind-the-scenes cameras in non-intrusive operational zones. The aim is to forge a closer connection between fans and players without infringing on their privacy.
Despite Świątek’s doubts regarding changes at the Australian Open, the tournament is known for its innovative approach, which has sparked mixed reactions among players. Concerns about privacy have persisted for years, especially since the introduction of additional cameras in 2016. Players are increasingly discussing the challenges posed by constant surveillance, stressing its invasive nature.
