Irving City Council Tables Casino Resolutions
During its Thursday meeting, the Irving City Council decided to indefinitely table two resolutions concerning the resort company Las Vegas Sands and its alleged lobbying efforts. This included initiating a ban on casino gaming on land owned by the company.
Proposed Resolutions and Support
Council Member Luis Canosa, with backing from the Families for Irving PAC, introduced the resolutions on Memorial Day. Council members John Bloch and newly elected Adam Muller, who are also supported by the PAC, reiterated their support for Canosa’s proposals.
Points of Order Raised
Council Member Brad LaMorgese opposed the resolutions, arguing they were submitted past the deadline. He noted they were added on a federal holiday, thereby violating standard administrative practices. LaMorgese expressed concern about lacking transparency and a potential breach of the Texas Open Meetings Act, which mandates a 72-hour notice for agenda items.
Rationale for Proposals
Canosa defended his decision to add the resolutions just prior to the meeting, questioning why he shouldn’t. One resolution aimed to direct city staff to draft an ordinance against casino gaming in a mixed-use zoning district that includes land owned by Sands.
Concerns from Residents
Several residents voiced worries about the possibility of Sands attempting to pursue a casino once again. Canosa mentioned that he wanted to gauge the council’s stance on the casino issue, emphasizing that prior public input was significant.
Transparency in Campaign Contributions
Another resolution sought to require the Lone Star Conservative Action Fund, a 501(c)(4) organization, to disclose its donors. This fund has been financially backing city council candidates opposed to Families for Irving. Some residents, like longtime resident Cynthia Sharp, called for regulations to define campaign contributions and impose caps to ensure fair local elections.
Reactions and Implications
Canosa referred to the resolution for donor disclosure as an “olive branch” towards enhanced transparency in electoral processes. However, Council Member Dennis Webb alleged that the resolutions were strategically placed to benefit Families for Irving in upcoming elections. With potential implications for the council’s composition, the discussion continues to highlight the intersection of politics and community interests in Irving.
