Here’s a paraphrased version of the article in HTML format with headings and approximately 7 paragraphs:
<div>
<h1>Concerns Raised by UK Foreign Office Staff over Israel's Actions in Gaza</h1>
<p>Over 300 employees of the Foreign Office expressed alarm regarding the UK's potential "complicity" in Israel's activities in Gaza, receiving a message that those who vehemently opposed government policy might consider resigning. This letter, addressed to Foreign Secretary David Lammy, highlighted apprehensions about ongoing arms sales and a perceived "stark... disregard for international law" by Israel.</p>
<h2>Official Response and Staff Outrage</h2>
<p>The response to the employees came from senior civil servants Sir Oliver Robbins and Nick Dyer, who stated that staff with significant disagreements with any government policy could ultimately choose to resign. This assertion was met with notable "outrage," according to an official privy to the exchanges, who voiced frustration over diminishing opportunities for challenge within the department.</p>
<h2>History of Civil Servant Letters</h2>
<p>The correspondence from the officials, sent on May 16, marked at least the fourth such letter sent by concerned civil servants to government officials since late 2023. These communications encompass a broad range of concerns regarding the casualty toll in Gaza, restrictions on aid, as well as issues related to settlement expansion and violence in the West Bank.</p>
<h2>Condemnation of Israeli Actions</h2>
<p>In their letter, staff pointed to the killing of humanitarian workers by Israeli forces and the suspension of aid to Gaza, which led numerous experts to accuse Israel of weaponizing starvation. They articulated that the UK government’s stance has contributed to "the erosion of global norms," referencing steadfast arms exports and the welcoming of Israeli officials despite ongoing violations of international law.</p>
<h2>Authority's Assurance on Policy Challenge</h2>
<p>In their May 29 response, Robbins and Dyer assured staff that "healthy challenge" was desired in the policy-making process and that mechanisms for raising concerns were established. However, they reiterated resignation as an "honourable course" for those who felt profoundly opposed to government policy.</p>
<h2>Response to Allegations of Obfuscation</h2>
<p>A former official criticized the response as an exercise in "obfuscation," arguing it granted the government "plausible deniability" regarding breaches of international law. This criticism evoked memories of the 2016 Chilcot Report, which urged reforms to prevent a repeat of past mistakes in policy-making.</p>
<h2>Government’s Stance and Legal Actions</h2>
<p>The UK government maintains that Israel is potentially breaching humanitarian law, which Israel contests. Recently, Foreign Secretary Lammy announced the suspension of about 30 arms export licenses to Israel, citing a "clear risk" they might facilitate serious violations of international laws. The situation remains tense, especially in the wake of recent ICC warrants against Israeli leaders.</p>
</div>This format maintains the core information while using different wording and organizing the content into clear sections.
