Sure! Here’s a paraphrased version of the article in HTML format:
<h2>Google's Compliance Deadline with Court Order</h2>
<p>Today marks the deadline for Google to disclose its adherence to Judge James Donato's ruling. This order mandates Google to enable third-party app stores on Android, cease the unlawful bundling of its Google Play Billing system with its app store, and allow developers to link to alternative download methods outside the Play Store for U.S. users.</p>
<h2>Changes to Google's Support Pages</h2>
<p>However, Google is not allowing developers unrestricted freedom. The company has updated its support pages, introducing a deadline of January 28th for enrollment in specific Google programs for “alternative billing” and “external content links.” Participation in these programs will incur significant alternative fees, unless Judge Donato endorses the agreement proposed by Epic and Google.</p>
<h2>Upcoming Fees and Charges</h2>
<p>While Google hasn't started collecting these fees yet, it plans to charge developers $2.85 for each app and $3.65 for every game a user installs within 24 hours after clicking an external link. Additionally, Google aims to take a cut of 20% from any in-app purchases and 10% from auto-renewing subscriptions. Developers will still have to submit apps for Google’s review and must utilize a Google API to track transactions, reporting all activities, including $0 free trials, to participate.</p>
<h2>Email Developers' Options and Discounts</h2>
<p>Moreover, developers opting for their own billing solutions will receive only a 5% discount on Google’s existing fees, likely reducing the incentive for seeking alternative billing altogether. Google will charge 25% for in-app purchases and 10% for auto-renewing subscriptions, with developers required to integrate a Google API for tracking and report all transactions within 24 hours.</p>
<h2>Cap on Fees for Small Developers</h2>
<p>To ease financial burdens on smaller developers, Google will cap some fees at 10% of the first $1 million earned. However, this change may not provide significant relief as similar caps already exist at 15%, presenting a mere 5% reduction.</p>
<h2>Potential Reactions from Judge Donato</h2>
<p>Judge James Donato’s reaction remains uncertain. In a similar case, when Apple proposed a 27% fee for external payments, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled Apple in contempt of court, a decision upheld by an appeals court. While the appeals court suggested that Apple might rightfully charge fees for linked external purchases based on necessary costs, they rejected excessive charges.</p>
<h2>Future Developments and Settlement Options</h2>
<p>Google maintains that the fees for external content links reflect the value derived from Android and Play, supporting its ongoing investments. Despite stating that it will not apply fees immediately, Google has committed to implementing a service fee for successful external transactions in the future. Additionally, Epic Games has expressed opposition to the anticipated service fees, indicating plans to challenge them if enforced. The potential global settlement between Epic and Google, which includes lower transaction fees, hinges on Judge Donato’s approval and could change the landscape significantly.</p>This version retains the original information while paraphrasing it, ensuring clarity and coherence across sections.
