We may earn a commission on purchases made through links.
When purchasing a TV, the chances of selecting a poor model increase with cheaper options. While many models claim high-quality specs, real performance often varies. Factors like panel type, image processing, and build quality significantly influence performance. Furthermore, budget TVs frequently include lower-quality components that may lead to issues such as diminished brightness, reduced picture quality, and inferior sound.
According to Consumer Reports, extensive testing of low-cost TVs has revealed some models that dramatically underperform. Common issues include unreliable HDR, ineffective 4K upscaling, and malfunctioning smart features. Users looking to prevent such problems might want to explore slightly higher-priced models. Below are six budget smart TVs that Consumer Reports recommends avoiding.
Vizio VFD32M-0807
The Vizio VFD32M-0807 may seem attractive at first for a 32-inch budget option, but its poor performance places it low on Consumer Reports’ rankings. Lacking 4K resolution and native HDR, it restricts picture quality to Full HD, leading to flat visuals in darker scenes. Additionally, limited viewing angles necessitate direct alignment with the TV for optimal image clarity. Users have reported dissatisfaction with image quality and pixelation issues, along with subpar audio quality.
Toshiba 75C350LU
Although the Toshiba 75C350LU claims to be a budget-friendly 75-inch 4K option, it cuts too many essential corners. While it supports HDR formats, its native 60 Hz refresh rate hampers motion clarity. Reviews indicate lackluster contrast, poor black levels, and disappointing HDR performance due to insufficient brightness. Although the user interface is user-friendly, it carries intrusive ads, detracting from the overall experience.
Vizio V4K65M-0804
Initially appearing as a solid choice, the Vizio V4K65M-0804 presents too many drawbacks. Despite its 65-inch 4K UHD screen supporting HDR, its native 60 Hz refresh rate stands in the way of smooth visuals. Poor black levels and reduced picture quality from wide angles contribute to its mediocrity. Its smart platform also lacks various features that many expect from competing brands.
TCL 40Q3K
The TCL 40Q3K underwhelms with its average performance. While capable of displaying Full HD content, it struggles with sharpness, particularly in dark scenes, and fails to perform well in brightly lit environments due to poor contrast. Users have reported slow processor speeds that affect startup times and app responsiveness, alongside disappointing audio quality.
Hisense 32A45KV
The Hisense 32A45KV is characterized by significant limitations, outputting only 720p resolution. Reviewers have criticized its poor picture quality with grasped motion sequences, muted colors, and insufficient brightness. While the audio is adequate for casual viewing, it lacks depth, making it unsuitable for action-packed scenes or music. Although the Vidaa OS strives to provide a smooth experience, users have reported glitches and slow load times.
Methodology
Consumer Reports evaluates TVs based on picture quality, sound, and features. They focus on models priced below $500 with scores under 50, noting deficiencies in performance. Detailed analyses also highlight missing features or limitations, such as the lack of VRR in some models. Critical HDMI ports and Wi-Fi capability are also highlighted as key features to look for. This informs readers to avoid budget TVs that fail to deliver quality images and sound.
