The following editorial appeared in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Meadville Tribune.
Addressing Pennsylvania’s Structural Deficit
Pennsylvania’s leaders are tasked with finding a more effective solution to the state’s ongoing structural deficit. The current approach, imposing heavy taxes on “skill games”—the arcade-style machines found in bars, convenience stores, and laundromats—seems inadequate.
The Need for Regulation
While it’s essential to regulate and tax these skill games, equating them to casino slot machines could unfairly benefit large gambling corporations over smaller businesses and community organizations. This could lead to detrimental impacts on local establishments.
Balancing Revenue and Community Interests
To ensure that revenue generation does not harm community interests, Pennsylvania should seek a balance that protects small businesses while also implementing necessary regulations on skill games.
Impact on Local Businesses
Prioritizing taxes on skill games like those of large casinos could diminish the role of local bars and stores, which are vital to communities. It’s crucial to consider the implications on these smaller establishments when structuring tax policies.
A Fair Taxing System
A fair taxing system should not penalize small businesses in favor of major gambling entities. This call for a rethink is necessary to ensure equitable treatment across various types of gaming institutions.
Conclusion: A Path Forward
In conclusion, Pennsylvania must reevaluate how it addresses its structural deficit. The aim should be to develop a fair and sustainable taxing strategy that supports community growth rather than stifling it through harsh regulations.
