Certainly! Here’s a paraphrased version of the article, maintaining the core information and formatted in HTML with headings and paragraphs.
<div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<i>This article is part of our</i>
<u><i><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/tag/rankings-and-tiers/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rankings & Tiers</a></i></u>
<i>series, analyzing key players, teams, and management across sports.</i>
</p>
<hr />
<p style="text-align: center;">
<strong>By Sam Amick, David Aldridge, John Hollinger, Fred Katz, and Mike Vorkunov</strong>
</p>
<h2>NBA Front Office Rankings Overview</h2>
<p>As we began our second annual rankings of NBA front offices in late October, some executives questioned why this evaluation is conducted yearly. One executive even texted, "Didn’t we just do this?" Yet in the NBA, time is crucial, especially as teams like the Oklahoma City Thunder lead the way, prompting quick changes for those lagging behind.</p>
<h2>Employee Turnover Highlights Trends</h2>
<p>Since our last rankings, seven teams have replaced their top front-office executives, showcasing the intense pressure in these roles. Notably, the Dallas Mavericks' firing of Nico Harrison — following a disastrous trade involving Luka Dončić — stands out among these changes. Across teams like Sacramento, New Orleans, and others, executives have been let go for not keeping pace with emerging contenders.</p>
<h2>Top Power Rankings</h2>
<p>This year, Oklahoma City Thunder president Sam Presti was voted the top executive for the second year running, remarkably building a potential dynasty while still acquiring elite talent. The Thunder’s ability to excel while also hoarding assets sets them apart in the league.</p>
<h2>Vertical Movement Among Teams</h2>
<p>The Houston Rockets made headlines by adding Kevin Durant, rising to third place from an 11th-place tie last year. The Indiana Pacers moved up as well, transitioning from 11th to fifth despite facing challenges like injuries. Meanwhile, the Detroit Pistons, surprising many, nearly cracked the top 10 after previously receiving no votes.</p>
<h2>Ranking Methodology Explained</h2>
<p>In preparation for the 2025-26 season, <i>The Athletic</i> surveyed 36 executives from various teams, asking them to rank the top front offices and identify one on the rise. Points were allocated similarly to NBA MVP voting, with anonymity granted for honesty in responses.</p>
<h2>Conclusion: Annual Exercise Validated</h2>
<p>With the NBA ever-evolving, the annual front-office rankings prove to be an insightful endeavor, revealing the competitiveness and strategic decisions influencing franchises’ successes.</p>
</div>This version retains the article’s core information while condensing its content and ensuring a clear HTML structure with appropriate headings and paragraph divisions.
