This series examines the Eagles’ crucial free agents with an eye on the upcoming 2025 season. I will discuss the film insights, the fit of each player within the scheme, and my preferences regarding their return. Any salary cap figures mentioned are sourced from Spotrac, with all data provided by SumerSports. Film clips will support my analysis, and there will be a video breakdown available on Patreon.
This piece takes a different approach, briefly addressing some notable remaining free agents instead of delving into each player’s performance in detail. I’ll keep it concise!
Johnson is my top priority among the Eagles’ offensive line free agents. He played nearly 600 snaps, allowed just one sack, and proved reliable on both sides, which is ideal for a swing tackle.
If another team overvalues him as a starter and compensates him accordingly, matching that offer for a player viewed as a backup could waste valuable cap space. He ranks as a high-quality swing tackle, not a franchise tackle, and this distinction must be reflected in his contract.
Verdict: Retain him if his price aligns with his actual role. Let him go if he receives starter-level compensation.
Toth may lack upside, but he possesses valuable versatility that offensive line coaches appreciate. He has taken significant snaps at both guard and center and performed adequately. His versatility gives him an edge over Matt Pryor, especially with his center experience and consistent play.
Verdict: A cost-effective interior backup option. Only re-sign if the price is right.
Pryor ranks as the most expendable player among the three. His limited snap count and minimal playtime were surprising. Despite some residual value from his veteran experience and multi-position background, he doesn’t warrant significant investment for retention.
Verdict: A minimum deal only, and that decision should come after assessing the draft’s direction. I’m comfortable with his departure.
Dotson‘s performance last year was disappointing. Despite limited opportunities, he failed to impress. His target rate was low, and his blocking contributions were minimal. Ultimately, he lost snaps to undrafted rookie Darius Cooper by the season’s end. While he has talent, a different offensive scheme might serve him better, but his past performances do not justify an extension.
Verdict: A clean break would be best for both parties.
Calcaterra faced challenges last year that were not entirely his fault. When used in a more flexible receiving role, he displayed usable skills. However, in-line blocking assignments highlighted his weaknesses, affecting the run game negatively. His usage was more a problem of scheme than of player capability.
Verdict: A return could make sense if Dallas Goedert leaves, and Calcaterra is redefined as a receiving tight end. Otherwise, starting afresh may be the best choice.
Granson possesses potential as a lighter receiving option but was misused in run-blocking situations that highlighted his limitations. The overall mismanagement of the tight end group has been evident, and Granson found himself caught in that failure.
Verdict: I would be shocked if he returns!
