The Masters is not just another golf tournament; it comes with its own set of unwritten rules and broadcasting expectations. Last week, however, ESPN reporter Marty Smith faced backlash from golf enthusiasts online due to his choice of footwear while covering the prestigious event.
Specifically, his pairing of Air Jordan sneakers with a suit while interviewing at Augusta National did not sit well with some viewers. Many criticized his fashion sense, arguing that sneakers are never appropriate for a suit, especially in such a respected venue as Augusta National.
After taking time to contemplate the criticism, Marty Smith finally addressed the backlash with a detailed message on social media explaining the personal significance of his Air Jordans. Although the original post that sparked the discussion was taken down, other comments remain online discussing his choice of shoes during the tournament.
Long post here …
When I was kid in Giles County, Southwest, Virginia, Appalachia, we didn’t have much. We were blessed with love and family and faith, but not material things. Granted, I never wanted for anything, but only because my parents worked to the bone.
My father… https://t.co/STTJl9EcE2— Marty Smith (@MartySmithESPN) April 17, 2025
Smith’s complete response reflects on his upbringing. He describes growing up in a humble household where his parents worked hard to provide. He recalls his desire for a pair of Air Jordans in his youth and how he worked tirelessly to earn them, showcasing the importance of hard work and determination in his life.
He notes that these shoes have significant sentimental value, symbolizing his journey and the inspiration he drew from basketball legend Michael Jordan. Despite the mockery he faced, Smith remains proud of his choice and believes that such items reflect personal achievements and experiences.
Ultimately, many viewers may not have even noticed Marty Smith’s sneakers, and those who mocked him would likely trade places with him in an instant. If Augusta National had any real objection to his attire, they would have taken action akin to past bans for more serious offenses. If the event’s organizers are accepting of his choice, it raises the question of why anyone else should take issue with it.
