Judging in Turki Alalshikh’s Boxing Initiative
Recently, Turki Alalshikh’s boxing initiative has faced both lavish praise and intense criticism, with some critiques being justified while others less so. However, one aspect merits more attention.
Subjectivity in Scoring
The scoring of boxing matches is inherently subjective, which can lead to issues of bias, incompetence, and even corruption. Most insiders in boxing can identify competent judges; unfortunately, some poor judges continue to receive high-profile assignments, often favoring the house fighter where financial incentives exist.
Noteworthy Decisions
Overall, Turki Alalshikh’s events have demonstrated a commitment to fair scoring. For instance, Oleksandr Usyk has faced Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua four times, and the outcomes could have logically swayed either way. Yet, even with significant financial interests favoring the home fighters, Usyk emerged victorious each time.
Fairness in Judging
Despite clear expectations for a Hamzah Sheeraz win against Carlos Adames, the fight ended in a well-earned draw. The trend of poor scoring often originates from influences within high-stakes promotions, but Alalshikh’s approach appears to emphasize fairness in the judging process.
Usyk’s Recent Honors
Oleksandr Usyk was honored as the “Fighter of the Year” by the Boxing Writers Association of America after unifying the heavyweight title, an accolade he received again in 2024. While in New York for this recognition, Usyk had a heartfelt interview, reflecting on his upbringing and his late father, expressing how his past has shaped his boxing career.
A Brave Perspective
Usyk highlighted the physical differences between himself and Tyson Fury, likening his experience to the biblical tale of David and Goliath. He stressed that boxing remains a sport of skill and class, rather than mere performance theatrics, underscoring his passion and respect for the sport.
Final Notes and Reflections
Reflecting on the recent May 2 fight card in Times Square, it was noted that security was stringent, emphasizing the importance of safety during high-profile events. A humorous exchange occurred between a police officer and a media member, illustrating the sometimes tense climate surrounding such significant boxing matches.
