Mixed reviews have emerged for the upcoming film “Supergirl,” according to Deadline.
What happened
The film “Supergirl,” directed by Craig Gillespie, is set to open in theaters on June 26. Critics have begun sharing their reactions on social media, praising performances by Millie Alcock and Jason Momoa while expressing mixed feelings about the plot and villain.
Chris Killian of Comicbook.com stated that the film combines the elements of “Guardians of the Galaxy” and “Mad Max,” describing it as “a grimy, funny, yet surprisingly somber space adventure.” He acknowledged Alcock’s portrayal of Kara’s tragic backstory and noted that Momoa, as Lobo, appears to be “having the fraggin’ time of his life.”
Tessa Smith described her reaction as a “mixed bag,” commending Alcock and Momoa but criticizing some adaptation choices, stating, “It’s, simply put, just fine.” Erik Davis highlighted the film’s themes of community and belonging, stating it encapsulates the idea that “home is where the heart is.”
Why it matters
The varying reviews highlight the challenges faced by comic book adaptations in fulfilling fan expectations while crafting a cohesive story. Many fans had high hopes for “Supergirl,” especially following last summer’s “Superman,” leading to significant scrutiny over storytelling and character development. The mixed feedback could impact the film’s box office performance and reception as part of the DC franchise.
Background
On May 27, 2026, “Supergirl” will mark a notable entry in the DC cinematic universe following the commercial success of “Superman.” The anticipation surrounding Alcock’s character follows her cameo in the previous film, significantly raising audience expectations for a deeper narrative in her standalone feature.
What’s next
Young Gon Kim is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of CR Today. Trained as a computer scientist in South Korea, he built CR Today to create an influential news outlet that pairs automated content production with human editorial oversight. He designs the editorial systems behind the site — source whitelist curation, search-intent title rewriting, and automated fact-source attachment — and is accountable for the publication's editorial policies, corrections, and AI usage disclosures.